Columbus Ranked #2 Fastest-Growing Tech Hub in the Midwest — But Local Workers Say Wages Haven’t Kept Up

The tech jobs are arriving. The paychecks, many workers say, are not.

Columbus, Ohio has earned a coveted spot on the national tech map, ranking second among the fastest-growing tech employment hubs in the Midwest, according to a new Brookings Institution report. The city has added 14,200 tech jobs since 2022 — a figure that would make any economic development office proud. But beneath the headline numbers, a troubling gap is emerging: a joint Columbus Dispatch and Ohio State University wage analysis finds that median tech salaries in Columbus remain 31% below the national average, leaving many local workers asking who, exactly, this boom is built for.

—

What the Brookings Report Actually Says

The Brookings Institution report places Columbus among a select group of Midwestern cities successfully diversifying away from legacy manufacturing and toward knowledge-economy employment. The surge in Columbus tech jobs spans software development, cybersecurity, data analytics, and financial technology — sectors that have expanded rapidly as major employers and startups alike have established or grown their presence in the region.

For a city long overshadowed by Chicago and Minneapolis in Midwest tech conversations, the recognition carries real weight. Columbus has invested heavily in infrastructure, broadband access, and university partnerships — particularly with Ohio State — to position itself as a regional tech hub capable of competing for talent and corporate investment on a national scale.

The job numbers are real. The momentum is real. But momentum and median wages are two different things.

—

The Wage Gap Nobody Is Talking About Loudly Enough

This is where the story gets complicated. While Columbus celebrates its ranking, the Dispatch and OSU analysis reveals a persistent wage gap that undermines the boom’s promise for everyday workers. At 31% below the national median for tech salaries, Columbus workers are generating economic activity and tax revenue while often earning significantly less than their counterparts in Seattle, Austin, or even Cleveland for comparable roles.

That gap matters for several interconnected reasons. First, it distorts housing affordability calculations. As Columbus attracts investment and development, property values and rents have climbed — but if local tech salaries aren’t rising proportionally, workers face a squeeze from both directions. Second, it shapes career decisions for Ohio graduates and job seekers weighing whether to stay in state or relocate to higher-paying markets. Third, it raises a pointed question about long-term sustainability: can a tech hub retain homegrown talent if it consistently underpays relative to national benchmarks?

—

Remote Workers and Out-of-State Firms: Who Is Benefiting?

One explanation for the disconnect between job growth and local wage gains centers on who is filling these new positions — and where the economic value ultimately flows.

A portion of Columbus’s tech job growth reflects remote workers employed by out-of-state or national firms that have established a legal or operational presence in Ohio without deeply embedding in the local wage ecosystem. When a San Francisco-based company lists a Columbus address while employing remote workers paid on national salary scales, the job count rises — but the local economic multiplier effect, the spending at Columbus restaurants, investment in Columbus housing, and tax contributions at scale, may be far more limited than traditional job creation figures suggest.

Similarly, when large out-of-state firms open satellite offices in Columbus, they often import senior leadership and specialized talent rather than developing it from the local pipeline. Entry-level and mid-tier Columbus tech jobs may grow in number while higher-paying senior roles remain concentrated elsewhere.

This is not unique to Columbus. It is a pattern playing out across emerging Midwest tech hubs. But it is a pattern worth naming clearly.

—

What Local Workers and Advocates Are Saying

Conversations with Columbus-area tech workers reveal a mix of cautious optimism and genuine frustration. Many appreciate the expanding job market and the city’s improving reputation as a place to build a tech career. Others describe accepting salaries they know are below market because Columbus’s historically lower cost of living made the math work — at least for now.

The concern is that the cost-of-living advantage is eroding faster than wages are rising. As the Columbus economy heats up and the city’s profile grows, the affordability buffer that once made lower salaries tolerable is shrinking. Workers who accepted below-market pay in exchange for affordable living are finding that trade-off increasingly difficult to justify.

Local workforce advocates and some city council members have begun calling for stronger wage transparency requirements, expanded apprenticeship programs tied to living-wage commitments, and more rigorous accountability measures for companies receiving public economic development incentives.

—

What Policymakers and Employers Should Do Next

Taken together, the Brookings report and the wage analysis present Columbus with a clear policy challenge. Attracting tech jobs is a necessary first step. Ensuring those jobs pay wages that allow workers to build stable lives in the city is the harder, more important second step.

Concrete actions worth pursuing include tying tax incentives and development subsidies to wage floor commitments, deepening partnerships between Columbus employers and institutions like Columbus State and Ohio State to create direct pipelines from education into well-compensated local roles, and publishing transparent wage data for jobs created through publicly supported economic development deals.

The Midwest tech hub narrative is powerful and, in Columbus’s case, increasingly credible. But a city’s economic success should be measured not only by how many jobs it creates, but by whether those jobs are building genuine prosperity for the people who live there.

—

The Bottom Line

Columbus is doing something right. Fourteen thousand new tech jobs in two years is not an accident — it reflects deliberate investment, strong university partnerships, and a growing reputation that is drawing real attention from the tech industry. The Brookings report validates what many in the city have long believed: Columbus is a growth story worth watching.

But growth without equity is not a success story. It is a warning sign. The 31% wage gap is not a minor footnote — it is the central question Columbus must answer if it wants to be a tech hub that works for its own residents, not just for the companies and investors arriving to capitalize on the city’s momentum. The jobs are here. Now the city needs to fight for the wages to match.